Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Analysis

Home >> Harvard Business School >> Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary)

Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Analysis

It is crucial to keep in mind that Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Analysis is among the important and leading US based multinational energy corporation that has actually been participated in nearly every element of the natural gas, oil and geothermal energy markets such as hydrocarbon production and expedition, marketing, refining and transport, chemical production and sales and power generation. The business has actually tried to forecast itself as a company which is devoted to the environment defense. The business has actually done this openly through "The Chevron Way" document and through advertising.

It tend to runs acrossvalue chain, incorporating various activities, also the company has actually produced massive quantity of earnings totaled up to $50592 in 2000. Similar to different other energy business, Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Analysis deals with substantial obstacles and danger in the routine business operations. It is to alert that the if the oil is mishandled at any production stage it would probably damaging the human health, natural surroundings and the profitability of the business as a whole. Accidents and mishaps may be occur at a number of sites. It is considerably essential for the business to be sensible about the cash that it invests in the steps utilized to manage such obstacles and threat, likewise the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution may conflict with the sustaining custom of decentralized management.

Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution

The Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution refers to the possibility of the environment degradation owing to the human activities, which in turn results in the indirect or direct harm to individuals within an environment. The environment can be harmed due to the exhaustive usage of resources, production waste, emissions, effluents and so forth. The factors affecting the environment also ruins the goodwill and credibility of the business as a whole in the industry.

The threat is Chevron management is worried about includes;

Danger of damage to the human health, natural surroundings, and the corporate profitability.
Environment externalities and its effect on the general public items at every worth chain stage
The value chain from the extraction of basic material to the pumps
Loss of reputation and goodwill
Cost of business interruption
Being the important and prominent energy company, and strong market image in domestic and worldwide markets, the company needed to resolve and deal with the operational obstacles. There could be the adverse and the negative effect on the security and health of the staff member workforce, the resources used by company, natural surroundings along with the financial performance and viability of the business since of the inefficient handling of the oil while in the production procedure.
The working condition of the company would have extreme effect on the safety and health of staff members. The exploration of gas and oil is among the dangerous operation which probably require safety measures to put in location. The leak or spillage of the gas or oil at any production stage would threaten for both the company and animals and environment. In case of the long working hours of workers, the health of the workers would be negatively impacted. For this factor, there need to be a standardization of procedure so that the management of the company ensure that the safety and health of employee is not at stake throughout the process o production. There is a qualitative and quantitative impacts of the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Help on business. The fines and surcharges might be indicated by the country's government and restrict some of business operations and prohibit the company for harming the environment.

Environment risk management

As such, the executives or management of the company should not manage the environment threat as they have actually handled other threat consisting of financial danger due to the fact that the management or executives of the company can measure the results of managing the currency threat in quantitative terms by assessing the expense advantage analysis. The goal of the management is the lower the cost sustained by company to support the management of other danger. It is substantially important that the cost of handling the threat needs to be lower than the expense of risk itself.

On the other hand, in case of the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Help, the supreme goal of the company is to lower the possibility of incident of the possible threat. If the business is not able to get away the occurrence of the threat, it might take procedures for the purpose of decreasing the negative effect of such threats so that the expense referring to the effects of danger and the loses would be reduced to some degree. Generally, the effects of the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution could not be measured in financial terms, so it would be hard for the company to compare the advantage made and cost incurred in it.

In addition to this, the cost required to manage the environment risk is based on the ethical factors to consider instead of state requirement or require by the policy of the company. This in turn, offers the sense of reality that it is among the unnecessary expenditure that is invest by the company, but it would bring preferable and positive benefits, for this reason enhance the bottom line of the business in indirect way. It is challenging to determine the environment cost due to the fact that it is embedded in the everyday operating cost.

Spending money on Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Analysis

If I would be at place of CEO of Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Help, I would be worried that the line supervisors will not spend enough, it is because of the fact that the line management probably offers the dedication of environment threat management that is lined up with vision and objective of the business. It is considerably important to verify such commitment and devotion by the level of staff member engagement and participation. Not just this, the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) health and safety function should have an agent at the executive position/ leading management.

It is not the director and the senior manager who plays essential function in management of environment danger. The line managers likewise play important part in the production and the upkeep of the health and safety within an organization. it is essential to keep in mind that the senior supervisors and directors keen on preserving the safe location of work and abiding by health and wellness legislations, the directors and senior supervisors would rely on line managers to monitor and implement such provision, not just this however also serve as a conduit for the safety enhancement suggestions and feedback from the staff members.

It is significantly important that the line manager ought to be individuals whom the directors and the senior supervisor would trust and would not be willing to compromise on health and wellness for the purpose of achieving the particular targets in addition to making themselves look better in the process. The line supervisors ought to spend quantity of cash on Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Help management. The line managers need to be straight responsible for the security of the workers within an organization, public and the environment.

The management training that is received by line manager is important prior to taking up the role and the training in health and safety problems or the environment risk management need to be consisted of in the tenure of the line supervisors. Not just this, along with the training in management functions and duties and numerous other associated areas including reliable communication and management, health and wellness courses which take a look at and describe the responsibilities of the line managers from the perspective of health and wellness ought to likewise be finished.

Quickly, I would be fretted that line supervisors will not invest enough on environment danger management, because it is important for the business to lower its effect on the environment and enhance its fundamental. Ending up being sustainable and lowering the waste would lead to waste, water and energy management cost savings. Not only this, it would likewise increase the revenue of the business through performance and effectiveness gains.

Business capture risks

The environment and security standards have been executed by the Chevron Research and Innovation Center through developing the Business, (a choice making tool) in discussion with the executives tends to handle downstream in addition to upstream operations. The Company supplies support to the managers to focus on the projects for the executing them and it also helps managers in carrying out the cost advantage analysis.

Often, it is not real of the benefits that the expense required for managing the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution jobs can be examined in dollar worths or monetary worths. ; in case the benefit comes as a low likelihood of the negative or unfavorable occasions, it is not clear that by how much it would be reduced by the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) costs. The extent of damage is minimized in other investment because of the undesirable event, however the qualification of the damage is challenging.

No matter the problem in answering such inquiries, Company help handles in setting top priorities for handling the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution. Basically, the Company uses spreadsheet method. It tends to utilize different assessments tables and inputs sheets for the function of converting inputs into the dollar values.

The supervisors are entitled to fill the input sheet for each risk reduction proposal with the info such as initial job capital expense, life of project or the length of time during which the benefits would be yielded by project and the occasion's description such as service disturbances, injuries and fire. The input more than likely compare modified and existing situations.

Significantly, the info is used by supervisors from the qualitative danger ranking metrics that tends to be incorporated in the previous danger management procedure phase. The supervisors likewise anticipate the likelihood of the unfavorable occasion more accurately as well as more specifically and the degree of the damage so that the previous qualitative evaluations would be supplemented. Unexpectedly, Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Analysis had successfully found Business reliable tool for measuring the cost associated to the danger management proposals. The business has actually tried to quantify the benefits through expecting the overall dollar impact of unfavorable occasion and deducting the sustained cost.

Recommendations to Keller about Company

After thinking about the evaluation and expediency of Business along with its benefits, it is advised that Keller must carry out the decision making tool Business companywide due to the reality that the tool would assist the supervisors to decide which projects ought to be taken forts in order to minimize the danger.

It has actually been used by the supervisors at refinery for the purpose of increasing the returns on investment in management of the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) Case Study Solution. Not just this, it has enabled refinery to generate millions dollar worth of threat decrease advantages without any extra expense.

Implementing Company companywide would yield numerous monetary and non-financial benefits to the business as a whole through assisting in discussion about the Can A Strong Culture Be Too Strong (Hbr Case Study And Commentary) damage and potential customers of the mishaps as well as about the relative significance and possibilities of the various sort of concerns or problems. Significantly, it would assist the management of company in figuring out the efficient allotment of risk management resources, the usage of which would enable the company to increase the total performance of investment made in the danger management.

Shortly speaking, Keller needs to implement the Business to efficiently deal with the environment risk management and assigning risk management resources in efficient way, hence increasing the efficiency of the danger management investment. It would enhance the viability and sustainability of the job.

Executive Summary	Swot Analysis	Vrio Analysis	Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis	Recommendations

This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.