Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Solution

Home >> Stanford Business School >> Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Study Analysis

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business along with the assessment of different alternatives, the company is recommended to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would enable the company to expand in worldwide markets without any reduction in its local earnings and any wear and tear of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the company might maintain its store experience and brand name uniqueness. Nevertheless, it might also think about alternative 2 that might permit the business to access the markets with no prospective investment. Although, the company could pursue alternative 1 which would allow the company to focus on prospective worldwide markets instead of the local markets but as the business is extremely based on the local markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing alternative 1 would lead to the significant decline in business's earnings. The business is suggested to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Solution Stores

International SegmentsThe business has a long term market position in US which can not be produced soon in the new markets. The choice would assist the business to broaden in international markets along with the elimination of issues raised in its local markets related to its diversity.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new international markets.
• Boost in earnings from global markets.
• Removal of issues connected to variety.
• Profits diversity.
• Action towards being a strong international brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of comprehensive earnings from the local markets.
• Boost in competitors.
• Distinctions in cultures could resulted in a failure of the brand especially in Asian nations.
• Low earnings at initial levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to get market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Analysis Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the intro of online market places through generating an appropriate company's site. With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba and so on might present an extreme danger to the market share of business. The rivals are moving towards click and Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Analysis stores with Gap introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets could reduce the revenues for company. In this scenario the company could consider introducing Click and Recommendations of Netafim Migrating From Products To Solutions Case Help stores. These stores with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the business to reach global markets, without ending its domestic shops. The benefits and drawbacks of option 2 are offered as follows;

Pros:

• Low financial investment
• Minimizing competitors danger
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging customer base
• Easy to manage
• Large Earnings
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy brand-new market entryway

Cons:

• Threat to the marketplace position
• Elimination of brand Originality
• Elimination of the terrific shop experience.
• Risk of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another option that the business might consider, is to expand towards the worldwide markets without closing its domestic stores that contributes to the huge part of revenues of the company. The advantages and disadvantages connected to Alternative 3 are offered listed below;

Pros:

• Minimizing competitors hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Expanding customer base
• Large Incomes
• Exploration of brand-new international markets.
• Increase in earnings from worldwide markets.
• Profits diversity.
• Action towards being a strong worldwide brand name.

Cons:

• Continuation of concerns associated with diversity.
• Distinctions in cultures could led to a failure of the brand name especially in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to get market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.