Recommendations of Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands Case Help

Home >> Insead Business School >> Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands Case Study Solution

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business together with the evaluation of numerous alternatives, the company is advised to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would enable the business to expand in global markets without any decrease in its regional profits and any deterioration of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the business might keep its shop experience and brand name uniqueness. Nevertheless, it could likewise think about alternative 2 that could permit the company to access the marketplaces with no prospective investment. Although, the business might pursue alternative 1 which would allow the company to focus on possible worldwide markets rather than the regional markets however as the company is highly depending on the local markets with 90% of its shops in the US, there fore pursuing alternative 1 would result in the significant decrease in business's income. For that reason, the company is recommended to think about alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands Case Analysis Stores

The business has a long term market position in United States which can not be produced soon in the brand-new markets. The option would assist the business to broaden in global markets along with the elimination of issues raised in its regional markets related to its diversity.

Pros:

• Expedition of new international markets.
• Increase in earnings from global markets.
• Elimination of issues associated with variety.
• Income diversity.
• Action towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of extensive incomes from the local markets.
• Boost in competitors.
• Differences in cultures might caused a failure of the brand specifically in Asian countries.
• Low incomes at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to acquire market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands Case Solution Stores

With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba and so on might pose a severe risk to the market share of business. In this scenario the business could think about introducing Click and Recommendations of Whos 1 Insead Harvard Wharton Lbs (A) Designing Research To Measure The Strength Of Business Schools Brands Case Analysis shops. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the business to reach worldwide markets, without ending its domestic stores.

Pros:

• Low financial investment
• Lowering competition danger
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Easy to manage
• Big Revenues
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy brand-new market entrance

Cons:

• Danger to the market position
• Elimination of brand Originality
• Elimination of the excellent store experience.
• Danger of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another alternative that the company might consider, is to expand towards the worldwide markets without closing its domestic shops that contributes to the huge part of earnings of the business. The pros and cons related to Alternative 3 are given below;

Pros:

• Lowering competition hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging consumer base
• Large Revenues
• Exploration of new global markets.
• Increase in income from global markets.
• Earnings diversification.
• Step towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Extension of issues associated with diversity.
• Differences in cultures might led to a failure of the brand name specifically in Asian nations.
• Low revenues at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to acquire market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.