Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Solution

Home >> Imd Business School >> The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction >> Recommendations

Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Study Help

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business along with the examination of different alternatives, the company is recommended to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would permit the company to broaden in global markets without any reduction in its regional earnings and any degeneration of its market position. The company could pursue alternative 1 which would allow the company to focus on possible worldwide markets rather than the local markets but as the company is extremely dependent on the regional markets with 90% of its stores in the United States, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the substantial decrease in company's earnings.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Solution Stores

International SegmentsThe company has a long term market position in United States which can not be created soon in the brand-new markets. The choice would help the business to expand in global markets along with the elimination of issues raised in its regional markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new worldwide markets.
• Boost in profits from global markets.
• Removal of issues related to variety.
• Income diversity.
• Action towards being a strong global brand.

Cons:

• Loss of substantial earnings from the regional markets.
• Boost in competition.
• Differences in cultures might caused a failure of the brand especially in Asian nations.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to gain market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Solution Stores

Alternative 2 includes the introduction of online market places through creating a correct company's site. With the increased trends towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba and so on might pose a severe threat to the marketplace share of company. Additionally, the competitors are shifting towards click and Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Help stores with Space introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets could minimize the profits for business. In this scenario the business could think about presenting Click and Recommendations of The Carlyle Group And The Az-Em Buyout (B): Value Creation After The Transaction Case Solution stores. These stores with a low requirement of funds to settle would allow the business to reach global markets, without ending its domestic stores. The benefits and drawbacks of alternative 2 are provided as follows;

Pros:

• Low financial investment
• Lowering competition danger
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Easy to handle
• Large Profits
• Low Operating Costs
• Easy brand-new market entrance

Cons:

• Risk to the marketplace position
• Elimination of brand name Originality
• Removal of the excellent shop experience.
• Risk of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another alternative that the business might think about, is to expand towards the international markets without closing its domestic shops that contributes to the major part of revenues of the business. The advantages and disadvantages connected to Alternative 3 are provided below;

Pros:

• Decreasing competitors risk
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of consumer base
• Big Incomes
• Expedition of brand-new international markets.
• Boost in income from worldwide markets.
• Income diversity.
• Step towards being a strong international brand.

Cons:

• Continuation of concerns related to diversity.
• Differences in cultures could led to a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low incomes at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenses to get market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.