Recommendations of The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy Case Solution

Home >> Ibs Center For Management Research >> The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy >> Recommendations

Recommendations of The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy Case Study Help

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business in addition to the assessment of different alternatives, the company is recommended to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would permit the business to expand in international markets with no decrease in its regional revenues and any degeneration of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the business might preserve its shop experience and brand name individuality. It could likewise think about alternative 2 that might enable the company to access the markets without any potential investment. The company could pursue alternative 1 which would make it possible for the business to focus on prospective global markets rather than the local markets but as the company is highly dependent on the local markets with 90% of its shops in the US, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the substantial decline in business's revenue. Therefore, the business is suggested to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy Case Analysis Stores

The company has a long term market position in United States which can not be generated soon in the brand-new markets. The choice would help the company to expand in worldwide markets along with the elimination of issues raised in its local markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new global markets.
• Increase in profits from global markets.
• Removal of concerns related to variety.
• Revenue diversification.
• Step towards being a strong global brand.

Cons:

• Loss of substantial revenues from the regional markets.
• Increase in competition.
• Distinctions in cultures might caused a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to get market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy Case Help Stores

With the increased trends towards online shopping, the online stores like Amazon, Alibaba etc. could position a serious threat to the market share of company. In this scenario the business might think about presenting Click and Recommendations of The Exxon-Mobil Merger Controversy Case Analysis stores. These stores with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the business to reach worldwide markets, without ending its domestic stores.

Pros:

• Low financial investment
• Minimizing competition threat
• Access to the world markets
• Expanding customer base
• Easy to manage
• Big Revenues
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy new market entrance

Cons:

• Danger to the market position
• Elimination of brand Uniqueness
• Removal of the fantastic store experience.
• Risk of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another choice that the business might consider, is to expand towards the international markets without closing its domestic stores that adds to the major part of profits of the business. The advantages and disadvantages connected to Alternative 3 are offered below;

Pros:

• Lowering competitors danger
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Big Earnings
• Exploration of new global markets.
• Boost in income from worldwide markets.
• Revenue diversity.
• Action towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Extension of concerns connected to diversity.
• Differences in cultures could resulted in a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low earnings at initial levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to get market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.