Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Analysis

Home >> Ibs Center For Management Research >> Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Study Solution

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business in addition to the assessment of different alternatives, the company is recommended to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would allow the company to broaden in international markets with no reduction in its regional profits and any wear and tear of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the company might keep its store experience and brand originality. Nevertheless, it could likewise consider alternative 2 that could allow the company to access the markets without any prospective investment. Although, the business might pursue alternative 1 which would allow the business to focus on potential worldwide markets instead of the regional markets but as the business is extremely based on the local markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing option 1 would lead to the considerable decline in business's revenue. The business is recommended to think about alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Solution Stores

International SegmentsThe business has a long term market position in US which can not be produced soon in the new markets. The alternative would assist the business to broaden in worldwide markets along with the removal of problems raised in its local markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Expedition of new worldwide markets.
• Boost in earnings from global markets.
• Removal of concerns associated with diversity.
• Revenue diversity.
• Step towards being a strong global brand.

Cons:

• Loss of extensive incomes from the regional markets.
• Boost in competitors.
• Distinctions in cultures could led to a failure of the brand particularly in Asian countries.
• Low revenues at initial levels.
• Boost in marketing expenses to get market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Analysis Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the introduction of online market places through producing a correct company's website. With the increased trends towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba and so on might pose a severe risk to the market share of business. The rivals are moving towards click and Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Help stores with Gap introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets might lower the earnings for company. In this situation the business could think about presenting Click and Recommendations of Fedex: The Leading Supply Chain Management Solutions Provider Case Analysis shops. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the company to reach international markets, without ending its domestic shops. The advantages and disadvantages of option 2 are given as follows;

Pros:

• Low financial investment
• Decreasing competitors hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Easy to manage
• Large Earnings
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy brand-new market entrance

Cons:

• Hazard to the marketplace position
• Elimination of brand name Originality
• Elimination of the excellent shop experience.
• Danger of decline in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another choice that the business might consider, is to expand towards the international markets without closing its domestic shops that contributes to the major part of profits of the business. The benefits and drawbacks related to Alternative 3 are offered listed below;

Pros:

• Decreasing competition risk
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of consumer base
• Large Earnings
• Expedition of brand-new international markets.
• Boost in profits from global markets.
• Revenue diversification.
• Step towards being a strong worldwide brand name.

Cons:

• Continuation of problems associated with variety.
• Distinctions in cultures could resulted in a failure of the brand name specifically in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at initial levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to gain market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.