Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Help

Home >> Ibs Center For Management Research >> Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Study Help

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the company together with the examination of numerous options, the business is advised to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would allow the company to expand in worldwide markets with no decrease in its regional profits and any wear and tear of its market position. By thinking about Alternative 3, the business might maintain its shop experience and brand uniqueness. It might likewise consider alternative 2 that could enable the company to access the markets without any possible investment. The business might pursue alternative 1 which would enable the company to focus on possible international markets rather than the local markets but as the company is highly reliant on the regional markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the substantial decrease in business's profits. The company is advised to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Analysis Stores

The business has a long term market position in United States which can not be created quickly in the new markets. The option would assist the company to expand in worldwide markets along with the elimination of concerns raised in its regional markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Exploration of brand-new international markets.
• Boost in profits from worldwide markets.
• Removal of issues connected to diversity.
• Earnings diversification.
• Step towards being a strong global brand.

Cons:

• Loss of extensive incomes from the regional markets.
• Increase in competition.
• Distinctions in cultures could resulted in a failure of the brand particularly in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at initial levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to get market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Solution Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the intro of online market places through creating a correct company's site. With the increased trends towards online shopping, the online stores like Amazon, Alibaba etc. might pose a serious risk to the marketplace share of business. The rivals are shifting towards click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Analysis shops with Gap presenting Piperline. This shift towards online markets could minimize the earnings for company. In this circumstance the company could consider presenting Click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups: Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Solution shops. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would allow the company to reach global markets, without ending its domestic stores. The advantages and disadvantages of alternative 2 are offered as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Lowering competitors risk
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging customer base
• Easy to handle
• Big Earnings
• Low Operating Costs
• Easy new market entryway

Cons:

• Danger to the market position
• Removal of brand Uniqueness
• Elimination of the fantastic store experience.
• Risk of decline in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another alternative that the business could think about, is to broaden towards the international markets without closing its domestic stores that adds to the huge part of earnings of the company. The advantages and disadvantages related to Alternative 3 are offered listed below;

Pros:

• Reducing competition threat
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Large Incomes
• Expedition of brand-new international markets.
• Increase in earnings from international markets.
• Income diversity.
• Step towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Continuation of concerns related to variety.
• Differences in cultures could caused a failure of the brand name particularly in Asian countries.
• Low profits at initial levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to get market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.