Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Help

Home >> Ibs Center For Management Research >> Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Study Analysis

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the company in addition to the examination of different alternatives, the business is suggested to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would permit the business to broaden in international markets without any decrease in its regional earnings and any degeneration of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the company could keep its shop experience and brand name uniqueness. It could also consider alternative 2 that might permit the company to access the markets without any possible financial investment. The company could pursue alternative 1 which would make it possible for the company to focus on possible international markets rather than the local markets but as the company is highly reliant on the regional markets with 90% of its stores in the US, there fore pursuing alternative 1 would result in the considerable decline in company's profits. The business is advised to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Help Stores

The business has a long term market position in US which can not be created soon in the new markets. The alternative would assist the business to expand in worldwide markets along with the removal of problems raised in its regional markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Exploration of new worldwide markets.
• Boost in earnings from worldwide markets.
• Removal of concerns connected to diversity.
• Income diversification.
• Action towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of comprehensive profits from the local markets.
• Boost in competition.
• Differences in cultures might led to a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low incomes at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenses to acquire market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Help Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the introduction of online market locations through producing a correct company's site. With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online stores like Amazon, Alibaba and so on could present an extreme threat to the market share of business. The rivals are shifting towards click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Solution shops with Gap introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets might lower the profits for business. In this circumstance the company could consider presenting Click and Recommendations of Fedex Vs Ups Competing With Contrasting Strategies In China Case Solution stores. These stores with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the company to reach international markets, without ending its domestic shops. The pros and cons of option 2 are offered as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Lowering competitors hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of consumer base
• Easy to handle
• Big Incomes
• Low Operating Costs
• Easy new market entrance

Cons:

• Risk to the market position
• Elimination of brand Uniqueness
• Removal of the fantastic shop experience.
• Danger of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another option that the business might consider, is to broaden towards the international markets without closing its domestic shops that contributes to the huge part of revenues of the company. The benefits and drawbacks associated with Alternative 3 are given below;

Pros:

• Lowering competition threat
• Access to the world markets
• Expanding customer base
• Big Revenues
• Expedition of new worldwide markets.
• Boost in revenue from worldwide markets.
• Revenue diversification.
• Action towards being a strong international brand.

Cons:

• Extension of problems related to variety.
• Distinctions in cultures might resulted in a failure of the brand name specifically in Asian countries.
• Low incomes at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to gain market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.