Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Help

Home >> Hbr >> Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Study Help

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business together with the evaluation of numerous options, the company is advised to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would enable the business to broaden in international markets with no decrease in its regional earnings and any wear and tear of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the business might maintain its shop experience and brand name uniqueness. It could also consider alternative 2 that might allow the company to access the markets without any possible financial investment. Although, the company might pursue alternative 1 which would enable the company to focus on prospective worldwide markets instead of the regional markets but as the business is extremely dependent on the local markets with 90% of its stores in the US, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the considerable decline in business's profits. The company is recommended to think about alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Help Stores

The company has a long term market position in US which can not be produced soon in the brand-new markets. The alternative would assist the company to broaden in international markets along with the elimination of problems raised in its local markets related to its diversity.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new worldwide markets.
• Boost in profits from global markets.
• Removal of issues related to diversity.
• Income diversity.
• Action towards being a strong worldwide brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of comprehensive earnings from the local markets.
• Increase in competition.
• Differences in cultures could caused a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low profits at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenses to gain market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Solution Stores

Alternative 2 includes the introduction of online market locations through generating a proper business's website. With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba etc. might present a severe threat to the market share of company. Furthermore, the rivals are shifting towards click and Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Solution shops with Gap introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets might minimize the earnings for business. In this situation the business might consider presenting Click and Recommendations of Unilevers New Global Strategy: Competing Through Sustainability Case Help stores. These stores with a low requirement of funds to settle would allow the business to reach international markets, without ending its domestic shops. The pros and cons of option 2 are offered as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Lowering competitors risk
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of customer base
• Easy to manage
• Large Profits
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy brand-new market entryway

Cons:

• Hazard to the marketplace position
• Elimination of brand Individuality
• Elimination of the excellent shop experience.
• Threat of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another alternative that the business might think about, is to expand towards the global markets without closing its domestic stores that adds to the major part of profits of the company. The pros and cons related to Alternative 3 are provided below;

Pros:

• Minimizing competitors hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging consumer base
• Large Profits
• Exploration of brand-new global markets.
• Boost in earnings from worldwide markets.
• Profits diversification.
• Action towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Extension of issues connected to diversity.
• Differences in cultures might led to a failure of the brand name especially in Asian countries.
• Low profits at initial levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to acquire market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.