Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Analysis

Home >> Harvard Business School >> Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Study Analysis

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the company along with the examination of numerous alternatives, the business is suggested to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would enable the business to broaden in global markets without any reduction in its local incomes and any wear and tear of its market position. By thinking about Alternative 3, the company might keep its store experience and brand originality. It might also think about alternative 2 that could allow the company to access the markets without any possible financial investment. Although, the business could pursue alternative 1 which would allow the business to concentrate on possible worldwide markets instead of the regional markets however as the company is highly depending on the regional markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the significant decrease in business's income. For that reason, the company is recommended to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Analysis Stores

International SegmentsThe company has a long term market position in US which can not be created quickly in the brand-new markets. The option would assist the company to broaden in worldwide markets along with the elimination of concerns raised in its regional markets related to its diversity.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new worldwide markets.
• Boost in income from global markets.
• Elimination of concerns related to variety.
• Earnings diversification.
• Step towards being a strong worldwide brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of extensive incomes from the local markets.
• Increase in competition.
• Differences in cultures could led to a failure of the brand particularly in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to gain market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Analysis Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the intro of online market places through creating a proper company's site. With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online stores like Amazon, Alibaba and so on could pose a severe danger to the market share of company. Furthermore, the rivals are shifting towards click and Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Help shops with Gap presenting Piperline. This shift towards online markets might lower the revenues for company. In this situation the company might consider presenting Click and Recommendations of Navistar International: Competing Against Paccar Case Solution shops. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the company to reach worldwide markets, without ending its domestic stores. The pros and cons of alternative 2 are offered as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Reducing competition threat
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging consumer base
• Easy to manage
• Large Incomes
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy brand-new market entryway

Cons:

• Threat to the market position
• Removal of brand name Individuality
• Elimination of the excellent shop experience.
• Threat of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another choice that the company might think about, is to expand towards the global markets without closing its domestic stores that adds to the huge part of earnings of the company. The benefits and drawbacks connected to Alternative 3 are offered below;

Pros:

• Reducing competitors danger
• Access to the world markets
• Expanding consumer base
• Big Incomes
• Expedition of new worldwide markets.
• Boost in income from worldwide markets.
• Revenue diversity.
• Step towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Extension of issues connected to diversity.
• Distinctions in cultures could resulted in a failure of the brand specifically in Asian countries.
• Low revenues at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenditures to acquire market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.