Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Analysis

Home >> Darden Business School >> The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc >> Recommendations

Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Study Help

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business together with the assessment of numerous options, the business is suggested to think about alternative 3. As alternative 3 would allow the business to expand in worldwide markets without any reduction in its regional profits and any wear and tear of its market position. By thinking about Alternative 3, the business could keep its shop experience and brand individuality. It might likewise think about alternative 2 that might enable the business to access the markets without any possible financial investment. The business could pursue alternative 1 which would make it possible for the business to focus on potential international markets rather than the local markets however as the company is highly reliant on the regional markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing option 1 would result in the substantial decrease in company's revenue. The business is recommended to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Solution Stores

International SegmentsThe company has a long term market position in United States which can not be produced quickly in the new markets. The choice would help the business to expand in worldwide markets along with the removal of concerns raised in its local markets related to its diversity.

Pros:

• Expedition of brand-new global markets.
• Boost in income from international markets.
• Elimination of issues associated with diversity.
• Income diversity.
• Step towards being a strong international brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of comprehensive revenues from the regional markets.
• Increase in competition.
• Distinctions in cultures might led to a failure of the brand particularly in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to gain market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Help Stores

Alternative 2 includes the introduction of online market locations through producing an appropriate company's website. With the increased trends towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba and so on might pose a serious risk to the marketplace share of company. Additionally, the competitors are moving towards click and Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Help shops with Space presenting Piperline. This shift towards online markets might minimize the profits for company. In this situation the company could think about presenting Click and Recommendations of The Battle For Value 2004: Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Solution shops. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would make it possible for the business to reach global markets, without ending its domestic shops. The pros and cons of option 2 are given as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Reducing competitors threat
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging customer base
• Easy to handle
• Large Revenues
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy new market entryway

Cons:

• Risk to the market position
• Removal of brand name Uniqueness
• Removal of the great shop experience.
• Threat of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another option that the company could think about, is to expand towards the worldwide markets without closing its domestic shops that adds to the major part of profits of the company. The pros and cons connected to Alternative 3 are given below;

Pros:

• Lowering competitors risk
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging customer base
• Big Earnings
• Exploration of brand-new worldwide markets.
• Increase in earnings from worldwide markets.
• Profits diversity.
• Step towards being a strong global brand name.

Cons:

• Continuation of concerns related to diversity.
• Distinctions in cultures could led to a failure of the brand specifically in Asian countries.
• Low earnings at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to get market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.