Recommendations of Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank Case Help

Home >> Darden Business School >> Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank Case Study Solution

On the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business together with the assessment of various alternatives, the company is suggested to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would enable the business to broaden in global markets without any decrease in its local profits and any wear and tear of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the business might maintain its shop experience and brand originality. It might likewise consider alternative 2 that might enable the company to access the markets without any possible investment. Although, the business could pursue alternative 1 which would allow the company to focus on prospective international markets instead of the local markets but as the business is extremely dependent on the local markets with 90% of its shops in the US, there fore pursuing option 1 would lead to the considerable decline in company's profits. The company is suggested to think about alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank Case Analysis Stores

Expansion towards global markets through opening new stores in other Europe and Asian nations with closing domestic stores is although an excellent alternative for increasing the global presence of the business. However, the closing of domestic stores could extremely affect the earnings of the firm as above 90% of its shops lie locally and closing those stores would eventually decrease the profits of the company. The business has a long term market position in US which can not be generated quickly in the brand-new markets. The alternative would assist the business to broaden in global markets in addition to the elimination of issues raised in its regional markets related to its variety. The pros and Cons for Option 1 are noted below;

Pros:

• Exploration of new global markets.
• Increase in profits from worldwide markets.
• Elimination of problems connected to diversity.
• Income diversification.
• Action towards being a strong worldwide brand.

Cons:

• Loss of extensive revenues from the regional markets.
• Boost in competitors.
• Differences in cultures might caused a failure of the brand name particularly in Asian nations.
• Low profits at preliminary levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to acquire market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank Case Solution Stores

With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online stores like Amazon, Alibaba and so on could position a severe threat to the market share of business. In this scenario the business might consider introducing Click and Recommendations of Takeover! 1997 (F) Jp Hudson And Co Hudson Guaranty Bank Case Solution stores. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would enable the business to reach worldwide markets, without ending its domestic shops.

Pros:

• Low investment
• Minimizing competition danger
• Access to the world markets
• Increasing the size of consumer base
• Easy to handle
• Large Revenues
• Low Operating Costs
• Easy brand-new market entrance

Cons:

• Danger to the market position
• Removal of brand name Individuality
• Removal of the excellent store experience.
• Danger of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another choice that the company could think about, is to expand towards the international markets without closing its domestic stores that adds to the huge part of revenues of the company. The pros and cons related to Alternative 3 are offered below;

Pros:

• Minimizing competition threat
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging customer base
• Big Incomes
• Expedition of new worldwide markets.
• Increase in income from worldwide markets.
• Revenue diversity.
• Step towards being a strong international brand name.

Cons:

• Extension of issues connected to diversity.
• Distinctions in cultures could caused a failure of the brand specifically in Asian countries.
• Low incomes at initial levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to gain market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.