Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Analysis

Home >> Darden Business School >> Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 >> Porter's 5 Forces analysis

Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Study Help

Porter's 5 Forces AnalysisA Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Help could be performed to create numerous techniques using the strengths of the company to avail opportunities, overcome weaknesses and to minimize the hazards. It might also be used to assess that how particular weak points withstand certain opportunities and increase the risks. The strategies prepared utilizing the Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Help are offered as follows;
• Usage of strong international brand name position and funds in broadening towards potential markets.
• Unique brand experience could help out the company to much better position itself in brand-new markets.
• Resistance in growth in the possible international markets encouraging diversity.
• High costs restricts the growth in numerous Asian and African nations with low per capita earnings.
• Strong brand acknowledgment, non-traditional methods of marketing and the unique brand experience might be used to reduce the danger from potential clients.
• Stringent look policies could led to the customer shift towards Victoria with high social duty.
• Limited target markets could led to a decline in the total market share of the business.
These strategies could help the business to improvise its market position and be at the leading position in the market.

Financial Analysis

Financial analysis for Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Analysis could be performed to assess the schedule of financial resources to the company that could be made use of in expansion towards worldwide markets. The financial position of the company could be examined by utilizing the information given in the case Exhibition 1. The ratios that might be thought about in financial efficiency analysis are given up the Table 1 below;

From the above Table 1, it could be seen that the business has an affordable financial performance with a ROE of 7.9% and a high sales development of 18.4%. A 4.3% net profit margin does not appears to be possible and the business should put efforts in increasing its incomes along with decreasing its functional expenses to increase its revenue margins.

Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Help


The division analysis includes the analysis of numerous business sections of the company in domestic and the worldwide, markets. Most of the business's Physical stores lie in US consisting of above 500 stores in practically each of the state of US. The business has likewise a worldwide presence in 8 different nations with its greatest number of shops situated in United Kingdom i.e. 21. The companyhas a total of 54 stores in international markets that is most likely the 10% of its stores in the US. It suggests that bulk of the earnings of the company come from the regional markets. The business is considering to broaden its stores into 7 more European and Asian countries. A chart showing the existence of the company in various global markets is given in the Appendix 2.


The company targets its clothing brand name to the young, tall and good-looking teenagers and kids that are thought about to be cool. This targeting policy is accountable for numerous distinctions in the company related to its competitors. For instance, the company works with great looking males and females for its stores and follows a strict look policy to keep tourist attraction of good-looking individuals towards its stores and supply a special brand name experience.


The company has actually positioned its brand as a high-end brand name targeting just a particular market sector. The company with its non-traditional ways of marketing through designs and agents posters its brand image as a luxury clothes brand name targeted to the cool and good-looking personalities in society. Although, this market position attracts numerous elite individuals towards the brand name however it harms the business's position in numerous communities focused at the equality in society.

External Analysis

Competitor Analysis

Porter's 5 Forces analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Solution faces a lot of competition in the market with the presence of different number of competitors in the market. Gap is also thought about to be a possible rival in regional as well as in global; markets as the business is considering to move in the worldwide markets.

This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.