Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Analysis

Home >> Asia Case Research Centre >> Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry >> Recommendations

Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Study Solution

RecommendationsOn the basis of above internal and external analysis of the business together with the assessment of numerous options, the company is suggested to consider alternative 3. As alternative 3 would permit the company to broaden in international markets with no reduction in its local earnings and any deterioration of its market position. By considering Alternative 3, the company could keep its shop experience and brand name individuality. It might likewise think about alternative 2 that could allow the company to access the markets without any possible investment. The business might pursue alternative 1 which would allow the business to focus on potential global markets rather than the local markets however as the company is highly dependent on the regional markets with 90% of its shops in the United States, there fore pursuing alternative 1 would result in the significant decline in business's earnings. Therefore, the business is recommended to consider alternative 3.

Aletrnative-1: Expanding International Brick and Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Analysis Stores

International SegmentsThe company has a long term market position in United States which can not be generated quickly in the new markets. The choice would help the company to broaden in international markets along with the removal of issues raised in its regional markets related to its variety.

Pros:

• Exploration of brand-new worldwide markets.
• Increase in earnings from global markets.
• Elimination of issues related to variety.
• Revenue diversity.
• Step towards being a strong worldwide brand name.

Cons:

• Loss of substantial revenues from the regional markets.
• Boost in competition.
• Distinctions in cultures might resulted in a failure of the brand specifically in Asian nations.
• Low earnings at initial levels.
• Increase in marketing expenses to acquire market share.

Alternative-2: Introduction of Click and Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Solution Stores

Alternative 2 consists of the intro of online market places through creating a proper company's site. With the increased patterns towards online shopping, the online shops like Amazon, Alibaba etc. could pose a severe hazard to the market share of business. Additionally, the competitors are moving towards click and Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Analysis shops with Gap introducing Piperline. This shift towards online markets could reduce the incomes for business. In this circumstance the company might think about introducing Click and Recommendations of Nintendos Disruptive Strategy Implications For The Video Game Industry Case Solution stores. These shops with a low requirement of funds to settle would enable the company to reach worldwide markets, without ending its domestic stores. The benefits and drawbacks of alternative 2 are provided as follows;

Pros:

• Low investment
• Decreasing competitors threat
• Access to the world markets
• Expanding customer base
• Easy to handle
• Big Earnings
• Low Operating Expense
• Easy new market entryway

Cons:

• Risk to the marketplace position
• Elimination of brand Originality
• Elimination of the excellent shop experience.
• Threat of decrease in elite sales.

Alternative-3: Expansion towards International Markets Without closing Domestic Stores

Another option that the company could consider, is to expand towards the international markets without closing its domestic shops that adds to the major part of profits of the company. The advantages and disadvantages associated with Alternative 3 are given listed below;

Pros:

• Decreasing competition hazard
• Access to the world markets
• Enlarging consumer base
• Large Profits
• Expedition of new global markets.
• Increase in profits from global markets.
• Profits diversification.
• Action towards being a strong international brand name.

Cons:

• Continuation of concerns related to diversity.
• Differences in cultures could led to a failure of the brand name specifically in Asian nations.
• Low profits at preliminary levels.
• Boost in marketing expenditures to acquire market share.



This is sample work and not applicable to real case study. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.